Skip to main contentThis guide explains how Core8 records calculation snapshots, overrides, and history, so you can explain changes and reconcile results.
When to use this
- You need to explain a commission outcome and show the inputs used.
- You want to audit changes (overrides, plan edits, recalculations).
- You need to answer “what changed since last review?”
1) Plan selection (which plan applied)
When a deal is calculated, Core8 records which plan was selected for the deal (and why). This prevents “mystery changes” when multiple plans exist.
If a plan is not selected, selection debug data can explain common rejection reasons like:
- assignment inactive
- plan inactive
- selection date outside plan effective/end date window
- missing required anchor date
Core8 stores a calculation snapshot per deal and period so you can review:
- inputs (effective variables used at calculation time)
- outputs (base amount, commission amount, quota credit, runtime variables)
Use the deal’s calculation transparency view to understand what the calculator produced and which plan version was used.
3) Manual edits (overrides)
If a user changes a deal value (for example amount/date/type), Core8 records an override so you can distinguish:
- what was imported (baseline/source values)
- what was manually changed (user edits)
Core8 also tracks manual changes to deal totals (for example, if a manager overrides a computed value) so you can see what changed and who changed it.
Where to audit in the UI
- Start with Deal calculation transparency to see:
- which plan was selected (and which candidates were rejected)
- the anchor/selection dates used
- gate metadata (invoice/payment) and why a deal is “waiting”
- calculator inputs and outputs
- Use the deal details page to review source vs override values.
Evidence checklist (when something looks wrong)
When escalating a mismatch, collect:
- Deal URL + expected outcome (from CRM/contract)
- Selected plan name + effective/end dates
- Selection mode + selection date; anchor mode + anchor date
- Eligibility gate mode (none/invoice/payment) and which evidence is missing
- The key variables that drive the plan (amounts, deal type, dates, currency)
Common gotchas
- If a number looks “wrong,” first confirm you’re looking at the right period and right plan (selection/timing vs payout timing).
- If two places disagree, check whether one view is showing source values and another is showing effective values (after overrides).
- When debugging, follow the chain: Deal → Plan selection → Eligibility gates → Calculation breakdown.
Related pages